<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Google testing in-site search box on brand searches: leaves a funny smell | Nilhan Jayasinghe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nilhan.co.uk/2008/03/google-testing-in-site-search-box-on-brand-searches-leaves-a-funny-smell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nilhan.co.uk/2008/03/google-testing-in-site-search-box-on-brand-searches-leaves-a-funny-smell/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 05:13:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Google testing in-site search box on brand searches: leaves a funny smell | Nilhan Jayasinghe</title>
		<link>http://nilhan.co.uk/2008/03/google-testing-in-site-search-box-on-brand-searches-leaves-a-funny-smell/comment-page-1/#comment-13350</link>
		<dc:creator>nilhan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nilhan.co.uk/2008/03/05/google-testing-in-site-search-box-on-brand-searches-leaves-a-funny-smell/#comment-13350</guid>
		<description>That would be great but Google will only allow protection for just the brand term - not when other non-brand words are included in the query.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would be great but Google will only allow protection for just the brand term &#8211; not when other non-brand words are included in the query.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Google testing in-site search box on brand searches: leaves a funny smell | Nilhan Jayasinghe</title>
		<link>http://nilhan.co.uk/2008/03/google-testing-in-site-search-box-on-brand-searches-leaves-a-funny-smell/comment-page-1/#comment-13349</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nilhan.co.uk/2008/03/05/google-testing-in-site-search-box-on-brand-searches-leaves-a-funny-smell/#comment-13349</guid>
		<description>Hey Nilhan,

Is there no way a brand, such as Virgin Holidays, can protect their brand in a site search for Google Adwords?

For Example - A Google site search for &#039;Virgin Holidays&#039; (http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=virgin+holidays) shows Virgin as the only PPC bidders as they are protecting for a brand search. Can they not do this for a site search? surely - this is the same as a brand search as you are searching for a term only within that brand&#039;s website?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Nilhan,</p>
<p>Is there no way a brand, such as Virgin Holidays, can protect their brand in a site search for Google Adwords?</p>
<p>For Example &#8211; A Google site search for &#8216;Virgin Holidays&#8217; (<a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=virgin+holidays" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=virgin+holidays</a>) shows Virgin as the only PPC bidders as they are protecting for a brand search. Can they not do this for a site search? surely &#8211; this is the same as a brand search as you are searching for a term only within that brand&#8217;s website?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
